Men Lighting Fires in the Desert: The SpaceX Christmas Tree Burn

A great leaping tongue of fire illuminates the desert hills of Jawbone Canyon, eliciting cheers and gasps from the dispersed crowd. The flame lashes violently at the dark sky before fading, as quickly as it came. Christmas trees after all, are mostly kindling; a powerfully bright flash which dwindles to near nothing. And burning Christmas trees, hundreds of them, is why these folks gather in the desert every winter. It’s the annual SpaceX Christmas Tree Burn. And recent years has seen it grow to near cult status.

From the outsider’s perspective this ritual is endearingly bizarre. Dozens of affluent young men gathering the discarded remnants of the most capitalist celebration in American society: Christmas. Then dragging these trees, like worker ants into the Mojave desert; a desert which by name alone conjures images of desolation and solitude. But this event is anything but lonely, despite its seclusion.

Both curious onlookers, and the wealthy Burning Man community have become aware of the SpaceX Christmas tree burn in recent years and begun to infiltrate its ranks. As with any sacred practice, the intrusion of outsiders is changing this yearly celebration. In the early hours of the revelry, while onlookers poor into Jawbone Canyon, the fire like the affect of the party, remains docile. It will not be until these interlopers have vanished that the real, effusive, profound nature of this jubilee will swell into full effect.

Even at a distance the Christmas tree burn is obvious. Hundreds of bodies surround a converted school bus. RVs both rented and owned, and trailers stacked 20-deep with discarded Christmas trees dance on the horizon. The vehicles circle around the blaze like so many covered waggons. Their hulking metallic bodies are backlit by the fire, which rises and falls like the tides, as trees are added and consumed. Intertwined with the dancing orange glow is the distinctly artificial thrum of neon rods and hoops which pierce the air and twirl along the arms of costume clad people. Rolling trance music echoes through the campground, occasionally caught and blown away by the howling teasing wind that roars off the mountains and down through the valley, before finally blowing itself out miles to the east among the lonely Joshua trees.

Pushing against the wind along a winding dusty road, one is deposited amongst the thronging crowd. Swelling, and retreating as another tree is consumed and the fire forces the revelers back into the darkness with its stark heat and light.

The main party in attendance are SpaceX employees who have driven up in droves for the weekend of revelry. The converted school bus and RVs are only the start. Within the limited eye shot offered by the dancing fire are expensive sports cars, a bivvy of lifted jeeps, studded-tire motor bikes, and more than a few gleaming Teslas. These toys belong to the grown employee-children of Elon Musk, who are by and large young, male, white, and so nearly uniform as to be comical. Clad in their SpaceX jackets, hoodies, ball caps, and t-shirts one could be forgiven for thinking the burn is a company sponsored event instead of a carousel of irresponsible freewheeling masculinity.

Juxtaposed against the backdrop of skinny white 20-somethings with beards are the fans, the groupies, the stumble-ins who look both delighted and alarmed at having found themselves included, by good luck, in the wildest party that almost no one has ever heard of. These interlopers are distinguished by their relative sobriety and appeasing laughter. Later, when the the chilling wind becomes too much they’ll return to their Saturns and Suburbans and disappear into the night.

Then, things can really get started.

The party crescendos into near insanity. The fire flings itself into the sky, sparks swirling on the wind, and enough social lubricant has been applied to the engineers that even the worst ideas seem bright and promising. Music drones. Fireworks light the sky. Plumes of pot smoke twine through the crowds buoyed along by hysterical laughter. Shots are taken, and again, and again. A young man takes a running start and hurls himself over the flames and the crowd erupts into a celebratory din the noise of which could shake the stars from the sky.

Away from the curious eyes of interlopers, these wealthy white urbanites can taste something very nearly like freedom. As Junger posits in his book Tribe these men need a communal bonding of sorts, an expression of masculine community that is so rarely afforded to them in their indoor fluorescent lives. In a society that no longer requires a ritual sacrifice to achieve manhood, perhaps throwing yourself across a flaming pit while your coworkers shriek like banshees is a worthy surrogate. Perhaps the artificial danger of intoxication mixed with dirt bikes is enough to jumpstart the civilized brain back into its more primal state. Perhaps in a society that exalts productivity over fealty, we have turned the extended celebrations of a prolonged adolescence into the closest thing the working millennial has to ritual. If the SpaceX Christmas tree burn is anything, it is a ritual.

 

A remarkably docile scene greets the sun as it cracks over the surrounding hills. In the light of day the debauchery of the night before is nearly erased. The frenzied charisma of communal connection replaced by the daytime persona of stayed company man. The fire pit smolders as bleary eyed former revelers stumble around the campground picking up bits of litter and loading themselves back into their expensive cars. One by one they depart back down the canyon, returning to their urban lives, the stink of booze and furor following until that too is washed away and washed down with Monday’s coffee.

Is it Environmentally Responsible to Have Kids?

In July of 2018 I’ll turn 30 years old which, in and of itself, is a mildly terrifying prospect. However, this upcoming decade change has ushered in a collection of more probing questions from extended family members, society at large, and relative strangers, all of whom feel they have the right to question and hold sway over my personal choices. As any femme-identifying person can attest to, the most persistent of these questions is: when are you going to have children? As though my uterus is some sort of frequent flyer program of baby making. As though my only value to this world is to push out children. As though any woman who doesn’t want children is somehow beholden to the population at large to explain herself, justify herself, clarify her own wishes and desires to those oh-so entitled question askers.

Before we move on let’s take a moment to familiarize ourselves with the following:

1) ‘No’ is a complete sentence

And

2) “Because I don’t want to” is as much justification as you need to give for any decision in your life. Period.

Personally, I have never wanted, nor enjoyed, children of any particular variety. However, if you (man or woman) really really want kids, then bully for you. I’m certainly not here to tell you what to do. But maybe, to help you consider how your actions affect the planet at large. It’s important to remember that this one miraculous blue dot is all we have, and that we’re all in this together, truly.

2017 was great for showing us how our actions impact others, and that personal responsibility has to be the cornerstone of an effective human race. Furthermore, as someone who is looking for ways to make their environmental footprint smaller, I started to wonder: What is the environmental impact of having a child? As we’ll see, the answer is both conclusive, and nuanced.

In 2017 the Institute of Physics – a London Based charity that seeks to promote the understanding and application of physics – published a joint study from the University of British Columbia and Lund University in Sweden that directly tied having one fewer child to a massive decrease in tons of CO2 emissions (represented as tCO2e saved per year). If you live in a developed country, the impact of having a child is 58.6 tCO2e each year. This number is higher than combined impact of not owning a car (2.4 tCO2e), avoiding airline travel (1.6 tCO2e per round trip transatlantic flight), and eating an exclusively plant based diet (0.8 tCO2e).  

In short, if you elect to have a child, you’d have to give up owning a car for 24.4 years to offset the impact of one year of your child’s carbon footprint. Alternately, you could go vegan for the next 73.25 years to accomplish the same thing. If those numbers seem daunting, worry not. A similar study from Oregon State University posited that each parent should only be responsible for half the impact of each offspring, so you can cleave those numbers above in two. However, the remainder of the OSU study doesn’t paint such a rosy picture for those parents to be.

The scientists at OSU employed the EPA’s Personal Emissions Calculator to extrapolate the yearly impact of having a child over an 80-year period — the current lifetime average for an American female. The OSU study claims that if all global factors remain the same, then having a child will sock an additional 9,441 metric tons of CO2 into our already clogged atmosphere during the life of that child.

However, because things in this world are rarely static, the OSU study also provides two additional numbers for the lifetime CO2 emissions for that child, one which they title a pessimistic outcome (12,730 metric tons of CO2) and an optimistic outcome (562 metric tons of CO2). While ‘pessimistic’ and ‘optimistic’ outcomes are hardly quantitative scientific measurements, and the study does not elaborate on how they came to those numbers, one thing is clear from table 3 below: even in the most optimistic scenario, adding an additional child to your household adds more CO2 to the environment that that could be saved by combining every other CO2 reducing action in the remainder of the table.

The OSU study, sums up the issue succinctly “clearly, the potential savings from reduced reproduction are huge compared to the savings that can be achieved by changes in lifestyle.” Bam, case closed. Or, maybe not?

As they say, the children are our future. So then the question becomes: is it worth having a child for the potential benefits that they may bring to the world? Unlike studies documenting CO2 emissions, the argument for having a child is a lot less concrete, but there is still a persuasive, though largely idealistic, argument to be made.

The first argument for having a child is that your progeny could be a genius. With an increase in population comes an increase in the number of geniuses. In the last 200-odd years the population has seen more than an eightfold increase in the global population. In that time we have also seen man walk on the moon, a massive increase in information accessibility via the internet, and a rise in renewable energy systems. The argument that some economists make is that a massive population is necessary for remarkable forward progress. Where geniuses come in, is that a genius, a true genius, on the scale of Albert Einstein, Hedy Lamarr, and Emmy Noether, are so vital to the progress of our species that they greatly outweigh the damage caused by the rest of the more pedestrian population.

The next argument is that the children being born today are coming into a world that has been thoroughly mucked up by adults, and they’re not willing to duff about doing nothing. Consider the landmark trail Juliana et al. vs The United States of America. This suit which was filed on behalf of 21 people aged 10 to 21 claims that an environment sustainable for human life is a basic human right. It goes to further claim that the U.S. government is infringing on the 5th Amendment by allowing global CO2 emissions to pass 410 parts per million.

Now, it should be noted that when the US passed the 410 ppm threshold in early 2017, nothing catastrophic actually happened. However, this number has long been touted by conservationists as a number worth being aware of, one that could possibly signal irreparable damage to Earth’s environment. It’s especially dire when compared to the 280 ppm level of the pre-industrial world. And, more worryingly, that it took us less than 60 years to rise the level of atmospheric CO2 from 316 ppm in 1958 (when consistent measurement began) to 410 ppm in early 2017.

Since it seems clear that nobody in our current administration is going to do anything about climate change, I certainly hope that we can raise a new generation that is committed to remedying the mess we’ve made of our home. And this, parents and future parents to be, is where you come in. If you elect to have a child, knowing the damage it will cause the world, then I fully expect you to raise a conscientious and environmentally aware human.

The OSU study, while providing overwhelming evidence that reproduction is environmentally damaging, also espouses the value of taking personal steps to reduce your emissions. The study states “this is not to say that lifestyle changes are unimportant; in fact, they are essential, since immediate reductions in emissions worldwide are needed to limit the damaging effects of climate change that are already being documented (Kerr, 2007; Moriarty and Honnery, 2008).” And goes on to illustrate the above point that your choices as a parent, as a person, as a human, on this collective merry-go-round that we’re all riding matter a great deal. “The amplifying effect of an individual’s reproduction … implies that such lifestyle changes must propagate through future generations in order to be fully effective, and that enormous future benefits can be gained by immediate changes in reproductive behavior.”

So take public transit, ride a bike or walk, stop eating meat, fly less, make your home more energy efficient by replacing your windows with high insulating ones and replacing incandescent bulbs with LEDs, stop buying new things, and recycle any and everything that you can, buy a higher MPG car, call your congressperson, call your senators, call your local reps every single day and tell them how important our environment is to you, exclusively support brands that have sustainable practices, buy local, and teach your children to do the same.

Ultimately, your daily choices matter a great deal, not just to those of us alive now, but those who are yet to be born. As a person, and as a parent, you are given the opportunity every single day to determine what you want your legacy to be, and I hope that it won’t be one of greed and consumerism, but instead one of conservation and awareness.